Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog

Debt Collectors And Bankruptcy

Posted in Debt

Debt collectors serve the useful role in society of forcing many debtors who otherwise wish to pay their debts into bankruptcy.  They also provide a source of additional income for bankruptcy attorneys when they violate the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), the discharge injunction of 11 U.S.C. § 524(a), and the Fair Debt Collections Act of 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq..

In spite of these important roles, the California Attorney General, Kamala D. Harris, has filed a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, based on the fact that JPMorgan Chase violated various collection laws.  As Andrew Tangel and Alejandro Lazo reported in the May 27, 2013 edition of the Los Angeles Times:

In a lawsuit that echoes the worst abuses of the foreclosure crisis, the state’s top law enforcement official is suing the nation’s largest bank, accusing it of using aggressive and illegal tactics to collect credit card debt from thousands of California consumers.  Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris on Thursday accused JPMorgan Chase & Co. of operating a “debt collection mill” that flooded courts with more than 100,000 lawsuits to obtain speedy judgments before consumers could fight back. Much as banks did during the housing crisis, JPMorgan used so-called robo-signing to churn out documents without reviewing them, Harris said.  The state alleges that JPMorgan relied on incomplete records and erroneous information to make its cases; in some instances, key documents allegedly were signed by low-level employees posing as assistant treasurers and bank officers.  Harris also alleges that the bank revealed customers’ credit card numbers, potentially exposing them to identity theft.  JPMorgan also failed to notify some customers that lawsuits had been filed against them, a practice known as “sewer service” litigation, according to Harris.  The bank ”abused the judicial process and engaged in serious misconduct against California credit card borrowers,” Harris said. “This enforcement action seeks to hold [JPMorgan] accountable for systematically using illegal tactics to flood California’s courts with specious lawsuits against consumers.”

Picky, picky, picky.

Let’s look at just one of the charges against JPMorgan Chase:  Failing to notify customers that a lawsuit had been filed against them.  What’s the big deal?  Does the bank have to tell you everything it does?  After all, the government doesn’t have to tell you everything.

For example, I knew a guy — let’s call him Joseph K — who faced criminal charges, and had a trial without ever finding out what the charges were.  He was eventually executed without ever learning what the charges were against him.  No problem, right?  Oops.  I just remembered:  I didn’t know Joseph K personally.  Joseph K’s story, called The Trial, was told by a writer named Franz Kafka.  It illustrated what could go wrong in a society without the rule of law.

Maybe JPMorgan Chase’s behavior wasn’t acceptable after all.

But surely the other debt collectors are all above board.  Not according to Mr. Tangel and Mr. Lazo — and stop calling me Shirley.  Later in the article they state:

[D]ebt buyers appear to have business models in which they are able to go into California superior courts and get default judgments against consumers.  A majority of these debt collection cases go to default judgments, indicating that many of these firms do not make adequate efforts to notify people that they are being sued . . .

In fact, I have seen remarkably illegal and wicked behavior by debt collectors, and have written about it in great detail.  I even discussed the way debt collection practices have corrupted Sheriff’s departments.  And still the problem persists.

If you’ve been troubled by debt collectors —especially those attempting to collect money while you’re in bankruptcy, or attempting to collect debts that were discharged in bankruptcy — the good news is you can get relief.  Call a high quality bankruptcy attorney to discuss your options.

 

 

What Happens To Social Security In Bankruptcy?

Posted in Chapter 11, Chapter 13, Chapter 7

This is a simple question to pose, but the answer is a bit more complicated to give.  Part of the complication lies in the fact that in bankruptcy social security has two identities:  it is income, and it is an asset.  The rest of the complication arises because there is more than one chapter of the Bankruptcy Code under which individuals and married couples file.

I.          Social Security Income As An Asset

In any personal bankruptcy, one of the reporting requirements is found in 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1)(B)(i):  “The debtor shall—file—  . . . a schedule of assets . . .”  Social security payments are an asset, and become part of the bankruptcy estate that is created when the debtor files for bankruptcy protection.  (See 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)). Continue Reading

Bankruptcy: What’s In your Wallet? It’s A Loan Shark!

Posted in Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Debt

On January 30, 2013 Shan Li of the L.A. Times reported:

Nearly 44% of American households are one emergency away from financial ruin.  That means they don’t have enough savings to cover basic living expenses for three months if something unforeseen happens such as losing a job or falling sick, according to a recent study by the Corporation for Enterprise Development.  Almost a third of Americans have no savings account at all. . . .  Many people living precariously have jobs.  About 75% are working full time, and more than 15% are earning middle-class incomes of more than $55,000 a year, according to the report.  But despite steady jobs, many of those surveyed are surviving paycheck to paycheck, trying to cope with the recession’s aftermath; one emergency could tip them over “the edge of financial disaster.”  Possible reasons for their lack of savings?  Experts say many factors could be at play, including stagnating wages, rising prices and high credit card debt.

It’s worth noting that a fairly large number of employed people are underemployed, which gives a partial explanation for the precarious position of many people.

How do folks deal with an income shortfall?  Some tap into their credit cards, and increase their debts.  Then they use other credit cards to pay the new credit card debt, and eventually things spiral out of control.

However, a growing number of people are turning to loan sharks for extra cash.  The breathtakingly high interest rates on Payday loans, Cashcall loans, and loans from Don Corleone guarantee a bleak financial future.  In the April 24, 2013 Los Angeles Times, Alejandro Lazo reported:

Payday loans often trap consumers in a cycle of debt, a new report by the federal government finds.  The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found that the average consumer took out 11 loans during a 12-month period, paying a total of $574 in fees — not including loan principal. A quarter of borrowers paid $781 or more in fees. Continue Reading

Can I Continue To Contribute To My Retirement While In Bankruptcy? (Part 2)

Posted in Chapter 13

In my last post, I discussed retirement contributions within the Chapter 7 context.  Our attention now turns to retirement contributions in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

II.        Retirement Contributions In A Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

In discussing Chapter 7, I referred to Form 22A.  The Chapter 13 analogue is Form 22C, which is very similar to Form 22A; but there are some differences.

One difference is Form 22C’s line 55, which permits a debtor to list “Qualified retirement deductions.”  There is no analogue to Form 22C’s line 55 in Form 22A.  This indicates that the Commission that created Form 22 (Form 22A for Chapter 7, Form 22B for Chapter 11, and Form 22C for Chapter 13) believed that Congress wanted Chapter 13 debtors, but not Chapter 7 debtors, to able to contribute to their retirement —presumably to “encourage” debtors to go into Chapter 13, so that their creditors would receive something through the Chapter 13 plan.

Why did the Commission include line 55 in Form 22C?  The best explanation is found in 11 U.S.C. § 541(b)(7).  A little background will help to understand that statutory subsection and its application to the creation of Form 22C. Continue Reading

Can I Continue To Contribute To My Retirement While In Bankruptcy? (Part 1)

Posted in Chapter 7

This easy question to state has a surprisingly complicated answer.  This is bad news if you were hoping for a simple yes or no, but good news if you’re a fan of more complex legal analysis.  In this post, I’ll discuss retirement contributions within the Chapter 7 context.  In my next post, I’ll discuss retirement contributions in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

I.          Retirement Contributions In A Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

There are at least two reasons why Chapter 7 debtors would want to continue contributing to their retirement plans (for linguistic simplicity, let’s assume we’re dealing with a 401(k) plan, since it’s easier to type “401(k)” than “retirement plan”):  First, to provide for those golden years of not having to spend two plus hours a day commuting (those of you who don’t live in a traffic nightmare area like the Los Angeles environs may not understand this problem except on a theoretical level, but it’s very real here), and second, to chew up income to qualify for Chapter 7 relief. Continue Reading

Disposable Monthly Income In A Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Posted in Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Debt

In Part 1 of my two-part series discussing the issue of filing for bankruptcy after a previous bankruptcy had been filed, I mentioned “disposable monthly income” in the context of Chapter 13 bankruptcy and told you that this post would discuss it in detail.  This isn’t the first time I have promised to discuss this topic.  I have put it off because of the somewhat esoteric, indeed recondite, dare I even say arcane, nature of the subject.  However, there have been some very recent developments in the case law on “disposable monthly income” that make it ripe for discussion.  Therefore, this post makes good on my promises. Continue Reading

The Wall Street Journal Says: A Flood of Bankruptcies is Good for America

Posted in Debt

Today, the Wall Street Journal’s Market Watch had an article by Michael Casey with the provocative headline:  Why a flood of bankruptcies is good for America.  It’s nice to see that the chronicler of record for the American economy understands the principle I’ve been stating for a long time.

In his article Mr. Casey compares the draconian approach Europe has to insurmountable debt with the much more sensible American position:

In Europe, . . . a place that is now beset by economic stagnation, sliding property prices and soaring unemployment, people are straitjacketed by laws that make it nearly impossible to have their debts forgiven.  In the U.S., by contrast, growth is returning and both consumer and business confidence are picking up after millions of foreclosures and personal bankruptcies were rammed through the courts.  The American economic system, shaped by an ethos that treats failure as a necessary if unwelcome element of entrepreneurship, is doing what it does best:  renewing itself.  The fact that Europe’s can’t do the same should ensure that investment flows favor the U.S. over time.  So although the euro’s higher interest rates are currently giving it the edge over the dollar, the greenback’s future is brighter.  And a key reason for that is because the U.S. economy has a better mechanism for clearing its debts.

Life is messy, and as Robert Burns put it:  “The best-laid schemes o’ mice an’ men gang aft agley, an’ lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain, for promis’d joy!”  Therefore,  it should come as no surprise that many people will find themselves in financial straits.  It is therefore good to live in a country that gives people a second chance through bankruptcy after financial difficulties.  Indeed, without the possibility of a fresh start after a failed business venture, most people would be reluctant to start a new business.

Section 8 of the very first article of the U.S. Constitution states:

The Congress shall have Power To . . . establish . . . uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States . . .

If way back in the 1780s the Founders saw fit to include bankruptcy in the very short list of enumerated powers of Congress in Article 1, section 8  of the Constitution, we may conclude that they felt that a fresh bankruptcy start was important.  As a result, America has been the land of entrepreneurs and innovation, more so than any other country in history.

Moreover, if God says bankruptcy is a good thing, who am I to argue with the King of the Universe?  After all, at the Lord’s command Moses wrote:

At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release.  And this is the manner of the release:  Every creditor that lendeth ought unto his neighbour shall release it; he shall not exact it of his neighbour, or of his brother; because it is called the Lord’s release.

Deut. 15:1-2.

Now, if only the state and federal governments could get rid of their debts.  Unfortunately, that would require that the elected officials actually cared about the good of the country rather than the good of themselves.  Maybe one day . . . when pigs learn to fly.

If you’re facing insurmountable debt and you want to get the fresh start that bankruptcy affords, call a high quality bankruptcy attorney to learn of your options.

Can I File For Bankruptcy More Than Once? (Part 2)

Posted in Chapter 11, Chapter 13, Chapter 7

My previous post dealt with the first of two possible settings involving a previous bankruptcy.  The first setting was when you received a discharge in the previous bankruptcy.  Today’s post deals with the second situation, i.e., your previous bankruptcy was dismissed.

II.        Your Previous Case Was Dismissed

Other than the 180-day bar of § 109(g), or some other time bar imposed on you by the Court because of naughty behavior, there is no time bar to filing another case after a dismissal.

However, there is a serious loss of protection with serial filing.  Most particularly, you lose the protection of the automatic stay, which is perhaps the most important benefit of filing — other than the discharge.  A little history will help to set the stage. Continue Reading

Can I File For Bankruptcy More Than Once? (Part 1)

Posted in Chapter 11, Chapter 11 for Individuals & Married Couples, Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Small Business Bankruptcy, Small Business Chapter 7

The short answer to this is, yes.  But as you may suspect from the fact that this post is considerably longer than one sentence, there is a good deal more to a thorough answer than that monosyllabic response.  There are two possibilities regarding your previous bankruptcy:  (1) you received a discharge, and (2) your case was dismissed. Today’s post deals with the first situation.  The next post will deal with the second situation.

I.          Your Received A Discharge In Your Previous Case

The big picture goal in personal bankruptcy is to receive a discharge of your debts.  This affords you the fresh financial start that is the raison d’être of a personal bankruptcy.  From a debtor’s perspective this is marvelously liberating.  However, from the creditors’ perspective it can be a hard hit.  As a result, Congress has put some time limitations in the Bankruptcy Code, meaning that you must wait a while between bankruptcy filings if you want to receive a discharge in the future bankruptcy case.  How much time?  That depends on which chapter you plan on using in your future bankruptcy case, and under which chapter you received your previous discharge. Continue Reading

Ipso Facto Clauses In Bankruptcy

Posted in Chapter 11, Chapter 13, Chapter 7

What is an ipso facto clause?  The phrase ipso facto is Latin for “by the fact itself.”  Ipso facto clauses are sometimes included in lease and purchase contracts, and they assert that if the lessee or purchaser becomes insolvent, or files for bankruptcy protection, then the contract has been breached.  In other words, under such a clause the very act of filing for bankruptcy protection constitutes a breach of contract (hence the appellation, ipso facto clause) that absolves the other party of any further contract obligations.

Are such clauses valid?  The short answer is:  No. Continue Reading