Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog

Debt Collectors; Sheriff’s Department Corruption; A Justice’s Nutty Opinion

Posted in Automatic Stay, Debt

This post gathers my thoughts on three eye openers.  Some were in the news, and some I experienced first-hand in my bankruptcy practice.  The common thread among these eye openers is a profound threat to the freedom and wellbeing of the citizenry.

I.          Debt Collector Abuses

A.        Whole Lotta Collectin’ Goin’ On

In the February 16, 2012 Los Angeles Times, Jim Puzzanghera reported on the recently formed Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and noted:

Debt collection has been second only to identity theft in consumer complaints to the Federal Trade Commission in recent years. The bureau estimated that 30 million Americans have debts in the collection process.

Thirty million!  Wow!  That’s one-tenth of the entire U.S. population.  So it’s not just my clients who are facing debt collection agencies and their corrupt and abusive tactics.  And given the volume of complaints it appears that abuses by debt collectors are widespread – it’s not just a few bad apples. Continue Reading

Discharging Income Tax In Bankruptcy; Splitting The Tax Year

Posted in Chapter 11, Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Debt

In my last post – the one about the taxation of cancellation of debt income - I promised I’d write about discharging income taxes in bankruptcy.  In fact, I recently published an article on the subject, but the flavor was a bit dry and technical.  I’ll try to make today’s version a bit less so.

By the way, although some articles on that site are ghost-written, I really did write the article.

I.          Discharging Taxes In Bankruptcy

There are two possible scenarios:  discharging taxes in a bankruptcy other than a completed Chapter 13 plan, and discharging them through a completed Chapter 13 plan.  Continue Reading

I Just Received A 1099-C Cancellation Of Debt Form. What Should I Do?

Posted in Debt, Foreclosure

Although I posted an article on this topic of tax debts after foreclosure on July 12, 2011, this question still comes up fairly frequently.  Therefore, another blog post on it is in order.  However, this one will not be a carbon copy of the July 12 post.

I.          The Five Exceptions To Cancellation Of Debt Income Tax

When a creditor forgives a debt you owe, the forgiven debt is usually credited to you as income for tax purposes.  The typical scenario these days involves the loss of a home in a foreclosure or a short sale.

Due to a provision in California real estate law, if the lender comes up short after the sale, it cannot come after you for the deficiency.  Instead, it will report the loss to the IRS and the Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”).  When it does, it will send you a 1099-C Form, listing the amount of debt it had to cancel.  This is your cancellation of debt income, and it’s taxable unless it falls within five exceptions listed in the Internal Revenue Code, and incorporated into the California Revenue & Taxation Code.

Those five exceptions are:

• the discharge – i.e., the debt forgiveness – occurred in a bankruptcy,

•the discharge occurred when you were insolvent,

•the indebtedness discharged was qualified farm indebtedness,

•in the case of a taxpayer other than a C corporation, the indebtedness discharged was qualified real property business indebtedness, or

•the indebtedness discharged was qualified principal residence indebtedness which was discharged before January 1, 2013.

For the first exception to apply, you have to have filed the bankruptcy before the debt was forgiven.  That way the debt is discharged in the bankruptcy.  If the debt is forgiven before you file the bankruptcy, then at the point of forgiveness the identity of the creditor changes from the bank to the taxing authority, and the debt you have is a tax debt instead of a mortgage debt.  Tax debts are usually not dischargeable in bankruptcy, so you could be out of luck.  (I’ll discuss the dischargeability of income tax debt in bankruptcy in my next post.)

For the second exception to apply you have to still be insolvent immediately after the debt was forgiven.  To illustrate what could go wrong, let’s use an example.  Suppose just before a foreclosure sale on your home your total debt was $525,000 – of which $500,000 was your mortgage debt.  And suppose your assets including the house were worth $450,000, with the house being worth $300,000.  At that point you would certainly be insolvent because the value of your debts ($525,000) exceeds your liabilities ($450,000).  However, insolvency for the second exception is measured after the sale, not before.  Thus, if the house sold for its market value of $300,000, and the bank forgave the post-sale shortfall, then after the sale your assets would be in value $150,000 (= $450,000 – $300,000), and your liabilities would be $25,000 (= $525,000 – $500,000).  This would mean that the value of your assets ($150,000) would be greater than your liabilities ($25,000), so you would no longer be insolvent – and you would be ineligible for the insolvency exception.  Ouch.

The third and fourth exceptions generally do not arise in the typical consumer bankruptcy case.  Therefore, if you think you might be eligible for either of them, consult a competent tax professional.

The final exception sunsets on January 1, 2013, and was enacted in response to the current housing mess.  If you lost your principal residence – this one does not apply to a rental property – and the debt that was forgiven was the original purchase money debt, then the amount forgiven after the sale does not get added to your gross taxable income.  Unfortunately, if you refinanced your home, and later lose the property, the debt forgiven would not qualify for this exception – unless you could prove to the taxing authority’s satisfaction that every penny of the refi went into home improvement.

If the forgiven debt does not fall within the ambit of any of these five exceptions, prepare for a tax hit.

II.        Filing The Tax Return

Suppose you were smart and filed for bankruptcy protection before the debt was forgiven.  Then the debt was discharged in a bankruptcy, so you don’t get the tax hit.  But the taxing authority won’t know that the debt was discharged in bankruptcy.  Contrary to what you see in the highly entertaining Bourne movies, the federal and California governments, and in particular, the IRS and the FTB, are not omniscient.

Therefore, when the taxing authority receives the 1099-C from the (former) creditor, it will assume that the cancelled debt should be credited to you as income.  To obviate this problem you should include the one-page Form 982 with your tax return – both state and federal – and check box 1 a because the debt was discharged in a title 11 case; title 11 of the U.S. Code being the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

You may wish to consult a tax professional to help you complete your tax returns.

If you’re close to losing a home in foreclosure, or expect to have a creditor forgive a debt you owe, hire an expert los angeles bankruptcy attorney to help you before it’s too late.  Good luck.

Loan Modification Horror Stories; Corruption On High

Posted in Home Mortgage Modification

I.          Loan Modifications:  The New Scam On America

In the January 20, 2012 issue of the Wall Street Journal’s Market Watch, Lew Sichelman shared a few of the many letters he received from homeowners detailing their nightmarish experiences in trying – unsuccessfully – to modify their mortgages.  Take a look at the stories and know that they are being repeated thousands of time a day all over the country.

Those of you familiar with this blog know that I have written posts about loan modification before.  My take on the process has been quite cynical because of what I’ve seen in my bankruptcy practice.

Apparently, the problems I’ve seen in the Central District of California are mirrored throughout the nation.   Continue Reading

Can The Debtor Compel The Chapter 7 Trustee To Abandon An Asset?

Posted in Chapter 7

A fellow attorney recently asked me this question because the Trustee kept continuing his Chapter 7 client’s meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. § 341(a).  What’s a work here?

By the way, you may wonder if fellow attorneys really are asking me these questions that I answer in the blog.  The answer is, yes.  Most of the questions I have dealt with in previous posts were posed to me directly by fellow attorneys.  However, a few of the questions I’ve blogged about were originally posed on a list serve of which I am a member, and I happened to be the one who answered them.  You are the beneficiaries of those answers.

I.          Abandonment Of Assets

A.        The Bankruptcy Code’s Provision

The Bankruptcy Code has an entire section dealing with abandonment of assets by a bankruptcy trustee.  (This is not the same as dealing with abandonment issues, which require the services of a competent, licensed psychiatrist to resolve.)  That section is 11 U.S.C. § 554.  The portions that are relevant to answering my colleague’s question are §§ 554(b) and (c): Continue Reading

The 2012 Foreclosures, The World And U.S. Economies, And Bankruptcy

Posted in Chapter 11, Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Debt, Foreclosure

Bankruptcy filings should surge in 2012 because the foreclosure pace is picking up speed, and because the world and U.S. economies are not headed for improvement in the near future.

I.          Foreclosures In 2012

I haven’t written about foreclosure in a while, but an article in the Thursday Los Angeles Times has given me the impetus to do so.

In the January 12, 2012 Business Section, E. Scott Reckard reported:

California and other states are likely to see an enormous wave of long-delayed foreclosure action in the coming year as banks deal more aggressively with 3.5 million seriously delinquent mortgages.  And experts said that dealing with the foreclosure process, from issuing notices of default to selling repossessed homes, is likely to push housing prices lower this year before the real estate market has a chance to recover.

Wow!  Three and a half million seriously delinquent mortgages.  That’s a lot of toxic real estate.  If you’re one of those 3.5 million people with a seriously delinquent mortgage, isn’t it time you considered bankruptcy?

II.        The World Economy

Is that the only bad financial news?  You know better than that.  Here’s what Sue Chang of the Wall Street Journal’s Market Watch reported on Friday, January 13, 2012:

Standard & Poor’s late Friday stripped France and Austria of their triple-A ratings and also downgraded Spain, Italy, and Portugal.  France and Austria are now both rated AA+ while Spain is at A and Italy is rated BBB+.  Meanwhile, Portugal’s rating was slashed to a junk grade of BB.  The move had been anticipated after the ratings agency placed 15 euro-zone countries on CreditWatch negative in early December. Continue Reading

Does A Debtor Have To Attend The Reaffirmation Hearing?

Posted in Chapter 7, Debt

A fellow attorney recently asked me this question because she had a client who failed to attend the reaffirmation hearing.  As a result, the judge disapproved the reaffirmation agreement.  She wondered if the creditor could now repossess the car.  The short answer is: Yes.  What’s going on here?

I.          To Reaffirm Or Not To Reaffirm, That Is The Question

Last month I posted a fairly detailed discussion of reaffirmation.  In that post I described secured debts and the reaffirmation process.  I won’t reproduce the entire post here – you can, after all, read it yourself.  However, I will reproduce a little bit of it because it is particularly germane to the question at hand:

. . . if you refuse to reaffirm or redeem, the creditor can repossess the car even if you’re current on the payments!  See, e.g., In re Dumont, 581 F. 3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2009) . . . .  If the judge approves the reaffirmation agreement the in personam liability survives bankruptcy. . . . If the judge refuses to approve the reaffirmation agreement can the creditor repossess the car?  . . . [I]f the debtor has complied with the requirements of §§ 524(c) and 521(a)(6), and if the only reason there is no reaffirmation agreement in place is because of the judge’s refusal to approve it, then the creditor has no authority to repossess as long as the debtor is current on the payments.

While most debtors would prefer not to reaffirm the debt, but still keep the car and continue to make regular payments, some creditors insist on reaffirmation.  My colleague wondered if her client’s car was safe since she had signed the reaffirmation agreement, even though she hadn’t attended the reaffirmation hearing.  Hadn’t her client complied with the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code?

II.        Attendance At The Hearing Is A Requirement Of Reaffirmation

As I discussed in the December 15 post, § 521(a)(6), coupled with the hanging paragraph immediately after § 521(a)(7) and In re Dumont, 581 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2009), make clear that if the debtor fails either to reaffirm the debt or redeem the item within 45 days after the first meeting of creditors, then the stay terminates and the creditor can repossess, even if the debtor is current on the payments.

The steps necessary (but not sufficient) for the debtor to reaffirm the debt are:  (1) signing the proposed reaffirmation agreement, and (2) attending the hearing on reaffirmation, if there is one.  Failure to complete either step is a failure on the debtor’s part to reaffirm the debt, resulting in stay termination and possible repossession.  After all, signing the agreement and attending the hearing are within the debtor’s power.

The reason the two steps are insufficient by themselves to accomplish reaffirmation is the possibility that the judge will refuse to approve the agreement.  Since the debtor cannot force the judge to approve the reaffirmation agreement, this final step is not required for the debtor’s compliance with § 521(a)(6).  This is why all of the judges I have heard opine on the matter say that repossession is not permitted under Dumont when the debtor is current on the payments, if the only reason there is no reaffirmation is the judge’s refusal to approve the agreement.  Unfortunately, there is no case law establishing this last proposition, probably because no creditor has had the temerity to repossess under those circumstances.

Involuntary Bankruptcy: What Is It, And Why Would Anyone File One?

Posted in Chapter 11, Chapter 11 for Individuals & Married Couples, Chapter 7, Debt, Small Business Bankruptcy, Small Business Chapter 7

A fellow attorney, but not a bankruptcy attorney, recently asked me this question because he had a business client who wanted to use an involuntary bankruptcy filing to collect money from a judgment debtor.  To answer my colleague’s question we need a little background.  Let’s start with the concept of a voluntary bankruptcy.

I.          Voluntary Bankruptcy

Almost all bankruptcies filed today are voluntary bankruptcies.  Regardless of the underlying chapter at the heart of the bankruptcy, a voluntary bankruptcy is filed either under 11 U.S.C. § 301(a), or § 302(a).  § 301(a) provides (with emphasis added):

A voluntary case under a chapter of this title is commenced by the filing with the bankruptcy court of a petition under such chapter by an entity that may be a debtor under such chapter.

The phrase, “by an entity that may be a debtor under such chapter,” appears because a business can file under § 301(a).  However, if the debtor is not a business, then the entity in question is one individual.  Section 301(a) cannot be used by a married couple.  Why?  The answer is found in § 302(a) (with emphasis added):

A joint case under a chapter of this title is commenced by the filing with the bankruptcy court of a single petition under such chapter by an individual that may be a debtor under such chapter and such individual’s spouse.

Notice the common thread in these two sections:  it is the debtor who files the bankruptcy petition.  The reason such bankruptcies are called voluntary bankruptcies is that the debtor voluntarily enters into bankruptcy.  Contrast this with the statutory language authorizing involuntary bankruptcies. Continue Reading

Can a Debtor Add His Spouse as a Co-filer to His Bankruptcy Petition?

Posted in Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Debt

A fellow bankruptcy attorney recently asked me this question in the context of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.  He had filed the case for the husband alone pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 301 , and due to changed circumstances decided that it would be a good idea to make the case a joint case pursuant to § 302.  He wanted to know if it was sufficient to simply amend the Voluntary Petition to add the wife.

It may surprise you to learn that the answer is, “No.”  While there is a way to accomplish the desired goal, it’s a bit more complicated than simply amending the Voluntary Petition. Continue Reading

Can A Social Security Overpayment Be Discharged In Bankruptcy?

Posted in Debt

A fellow bankruptcy attorney recently asked me this question based on his reading of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7), which provides (with emphasis added):

A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228 (a), 1228 (b), or 1328 (b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt— . . . to the extent such debt is for a fine, penalty, or forfeiture payable to and for the benefit of a governmental unit, and is not compensation for actual pecuniary loss . . .

Since the obligation to repay a social security overpayment is a debt to a governmental unit, but could be characterized as “compensation for actual pecuniary loss,” the questioner wanted to know if it could be discharged in bankruptcy. Continue Reading